This proposal originates from MARC Discussion Paper 2017-DP02 and forms part of a series of discussion papers and proposals from the PCC URI Task Group, the British Library, the German National Library, and a number of other stakeholders seeking to expand MARC support for linked data identifiers. ![]() ![]() 2017-09: Defining Field 758 (Resource Identifier) 1. ![]() KEYWORDS: Field 758 (BD) Resource Identifier (BD)Ġ5/16/17 – Made available to the MARC community for discussion.Ġ6/24/17 – Results of MARC Advisory Committee discussion: Approved, with the amendment that subfield $1 will be added to field 758 the first sentence of the field definition will be amended to read “An identifier for a resource that is either the resource described in the bibliographic record or a resource to which it is related.” It was noted that, while the inclusion of an explicit relationship in field 758 may be desirable, the MARC formats do not mandate the use of specific subfields in field definitions the application of field 758 would need to be developed as a matter of best practice by the community.Ġ8/07/17 - Results of MARC Steering Group review - Agreed with the MAC decision. SUMMARY: This paper proposes establishing a new field 758 in the MARC 21 Bibliographic format to identify related resources. SOURCE: PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC, Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) NAME: Defining Field 758 (Resource Identifier) in the MARC 21 Bibliographic Format 2017-09: Defining Field 758 (Resource Identifier) in the MARC 21 Bibliographic Format (Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress)įor Librarians and Archivists > Standards
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |